![]() ![]() Further, companies in Amadeus were deleted if inactive for 4-6 years, creating survivorship bias this is not the case with Fame and Orbis. There also key variables which are exclusive to Fame and UK-based companies, such as VAT numbers and import & export commodities (similar for Ireland). Fame has 20 years of financial history whereas Orbis has 10. Amadeus covered all very large and large companies in Europe (except banks), defined as satisfying at least one of the following criteria:Ī key difference is historical coverage.Orbis includes all companies of all sizes around the world.Fame includes all companies registered in the UK and Ireland (over 3 million companies). Bureau van Dijk is widely recognized as a specialist provider of both public and hard to reach private company information within the academic community.Gegevens uit meer dan 160 verschillende bronnen zijn gecombineerd en gestandaardiseerd beschikbaar gemaakt om vergelijkingen mogelijk te maken. De database bevat informatie over meer dan 400 miljoen bedrijven wereldwijd. Do a detailed financial analysis on a company you can also include our complementary information. Create analysis across borders using our standard financial template. ![]() Search by hundreds of criteria you can search by trends and over multiple years. To access them, navigate to the ‘Industry Research’ tab on the Orbis homepage and select the documents library. Amadeus is easy to use and helps you navigate company information quickly and easily. The ORBIS database provides data on firms. Orbis is de krachtigste bron voor bedrijfsinformatie over private ondernemingen. In the Orbis database you can find industry reports produced by Marketline, which usually focus on an industry’s operations within a particular industry. Reduce the number of errors when onboarding a new supplier. On it was announced that Moody's entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Bureau van Dijk, which completed in August 2017. As of 30 November 2022, Amadeus was retired. the administrative micro-dataset ORBIS, provided commercially by Bureau van Dijk Electronic Publishing (BvD). Validate your supplier data via Bureau van Dijks Orbis database. Orbis is Bureau van Dijk's flagship company database. For help with one of our products, contact our Client Service Team directly at or via the telephone numbers listed below. Bureau van Dijk Fame and Orbis are two databases which provide financial coverage of private and quoted companies and their directors. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() So let's find out immediately who Cooper is and the identity of his goal, Frank, leaving to subsequent missions and events during the game the duty to explain, with due time, the reason for this dispute between the two.Īll in a wild West well recognizable by lovers of the setting: a vast hard, inhospitable region that in the full representation of the American Dream sees every furrow at work to try, at any cost, to break out and make success, bringing to mind the classic image of the cowboy on horseback of his steed who, surviving a new and turbulent day, rides triumphantly towards the sunset bringing with him a new, rigorous experience that will accompany him towards a new adventure. This primary feature has also been left intact in this new chapter, taking the ball from the start, in the missions aimed at explaining the game mechanics, taking advantage of it to immediately explain the purpose and the general framework of the narrative. This allows players who did not know this series to not feel out of place regarding any references to key elements of the story and allows a fresh game and narration for both novices and veterans, balancing the narrative between long-term goals of its characters and their starting points.Ī decision therefore targeted and successful, which develops successfully thanks to the maintenance of a certain integrity of the original identity of the series, proposing a story that manages to evoke the sensations of the best genre films through iconic, humorous and narrative moments that they follow the clichés and key points of the works of this genre.Īlready in his time Desperados had represented a certain transformation for the genre of belonging: if Commandos, in its most basic simplification, can be seen as a series of "puzzles" vaguely interconnected by the basic thematic setting of the Second World War, Desperados has undoubtedly had the merit of changing the approach to incorporating the mechanical elements of fundamental gameplay into a cohesive narrative. It is therefore not surprising that the developers are more than welcome to start from the origins of Coop and its trusted companions by offering a prequel to Desperatos: Wanted Dead or Alive. Tabula rasaĮven considering the unsuccessful spin-off Helldorado released in 2007, the Desperados series, which started in 2001, has not seen a new chapter since 2006. Somehow, though, this classic video game genre manages to stay alive, especially thanks to the work of the German studio Mimimi Games which in 2016 allowed us to relive the charm of this particular type of title with Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun and that today returns to the office with an unexpected following of one of the famous exponents of the genre: taking a step back in time in the inhospitable America of the second half of the 800, we find the indomitable bounty hunter John Cooper and his band combines woe betide you with a new adventure in Desperados 3. In today's videogame era, finding stealth games is increasingly rare and occasional, and even more so is the real-time strategic variant, a subgenre that since 1998 (Commandos' release year: Behind the enemy lines) has seen only sporadic publications from small productions. They're still self-publishing their sweet potato, mind.Desperados 3 is a real-time strategic stealth game developed by Prize Games and published by THQ Nordic on Jon the Playstation 4, Xbox One platforms and in general for Windows operating systems. Mimimi also noted that they've found financial support from Kowloon Nights, a fund who've previously put cash into games including Spiritfarer, Scorn, Godfall, and 30XX. Our Shadow Tactics review declared their 2016 debut "a fabulous game", then our Desperados 3 review said last year's game was "every bit as brilliant." Roll on, number three. "On the other hand, it signifies that with the decision to create a new IP we are able to create a whole new world, with a new setting, story and characters that all follow our own creative design choices." Nor are we working on a Commandos or another Desperados game," they say. ![]() ![]() "It does mean that, on one hand, we are not working on Shadow Tactics 2. ![]() They don't say much about what it is, but they're clear on what it's not. To see this content please enable targeting cookies.Īfter announcing the project currently called Codename Süßkartoffel (German for sweet potato) last year, Mimimi declared today that the real-time tactics game is "a brand-new, original IP". ![]() ![]() When I went home for Christmas break that year, I told my father that I wasn’t going to be a lawyer and that I was looking around at my options. I knew I could write, so I figured on a degree in English, a subject I had dominated throughout high school and even in college. My freshman year of college, my life-long goal of becoming a lawyer was crushed after one bad Poli Sci course, so I went hunting for another major. YOU’RE NOT PAYING FOR WHAT YOU THINK YOU’RE PAYING FOR: People often assume that becoming a journalist has been a life-long ambition for anyone who entered the field after seeing “All The President’s Men” or “The Paper.” Truth be told, I never wanted to be a journalist or a journalism professor growing up. You need to pay for it if you want or need it. We don’t have a special set of tools that leave you in awe or a product that you can show other people to say, “Check out what I bought!” In addition, the reason it’s easier to short journalists is because it never seems like we are saving you from a disaster like the tow-truck driver who gets your broken car off the freeway or the tree surgeon who pulls the giant oak that fell during a storm off your house. Now you’re being asked to pay full price for the cost of journalism and it suddenly looks exorbitant. (How and why it didn’t could take up a dozen books, but it’s not Craigslist’s fault, despite what publishers and hedge-fund managers who own newspaper stocks will tell you.) The higher the circulation, the more newspapers could charge for ads. The one benefit the audience had to the newspaper was in its sum total of eyeballs. ![]() The ad money covered the big costs of doing journalism while your subscription or copy price was simply a token of good will. The money flowed freely, as newspapers could deliver eyeballs to the advertisers and thus demonstrate value to them. Newspapers and magazines were chock full of large advertisements for everything from clothing stores to car dealerships. It’s when your insurance is gone that you notice, “Holy crap! That’s some expensive stuff!”įor years, advertisers accounted for most of the costs of the work. It’s like picking up a prescription when you have insurance: You pay your $10 or $20 that is your part of the deal and the insurance company picks up the rest of the tab. Truth be told, journalism ALWAYS cost money, but the readers didn’t notice because they weren’t footing the bill. The person did work, and you’re going to pay for it. I’m going on Facebook right now and putting a “like” on you today! Goodbye!” When that guy or gal comes over and fixes the problem, you wouldn’t think to just say, “Thank you. ![]() When your dishwasher decides to start flooding the house on a random Tuesday night, you call a plumber and beg someone to come over and stop the hydro-destructive force in your kitchen. WORK COSTS MONEY: As dumb as that statement sounds, it seems necessary to make it up front. However, in defense of the field itself, I’ll simply give you three reasons why complaining about having to spend your hard-earned couch-cushion cash on news is just plain dumb: ![]() It would also take way too long to debate the merits of various profitability models that could return news organizations to prominence. It’s stupid to pay for stuff like this because the internet is free!įollowing the trail of breadcrumbs that led newspapers from being important local sources of information to disemboweled corporate shells would take far too long for a post like this.In response, several people broke out the traditional diatribes against such larceny: When venerable journalist Crocker Stephenson, who used to work for the Journal-Sentinel, posted the piece to his Facebook wall, a number of people groused about their inability to access Stingl’s work. I’ve linked to the article here, but most of you won’t be able to see it because it’s only accessible to the paper’s subscribers. The piece ran in the wake of a car wreck that killed an off-duty Milwaukee police officer, and was the kind of thing more papers would have done back in the days when staffs were robust and smoking was allowed in the newsroom. ![]() Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel columnist Jim Stingl wrote a nice local column that took a look at how people consistently run red lights the corner of 60th and Capitol. ![]() ![]() ![]() now look, the last solution does fairly much what the OP managed to get done (and more), in. programming is about getting things understood and done, not about programmers writing code that approaches the spatial efficiency of gzip. chr for character, nr for number and R for the return value (more likely to be, ugh, retval where used in the standard library) are in my style book. Notice a few points here: i strive for clarity, which is why i try to avoid over-using abbreviations. however, performance would in any case be dependent on the expected usage pattern (i am sure you truncate your phone nrs first thing, right? so those would be many small strings to be processed, not few big ones). ![]() ![]() ![]() the disadvantage of this solution would be that you iterate over the input characters from within Python, not making use of the potentially speeder C traversal as offered by str.replace() or even a regular expression. That last stanza could well be written on a single line. Return illegal_phone_nr_chrs_re.sub( '', phone_nr ) Illegal_phone_nr_chrs_re = _new_regex( r"" ) and you can do that with a regular expression. So what you want is really not to dis-allow specific characters (there are about a hundred thousand defined codepoints in unicode 5.1, so how do catch up with those?), but to allow those very characters that are deemed legal in dial strings. why not re-write the sanitizing method to something very generic without becoming more complex? after all, how can you be sure your users never input other deviant characters in that web form field? this can be demonstrated by the fact that at least in mobile nets, + and # and maybe more are valid characters in a dial string (dial, string-see?).īut apart from that, sanitizing a user input phone nr to get out a normalized and safe representation is a very, very valid concern-only i feel that your methodology is too specific. In this special application, of course, what you really want to do is just cancelling out any unwanted characters, so you can simplify this: probes = ' ()'Ĭoming to think of it, it is not quite clear to me why you want to turn a phone nr into an integer-that is simply the wrong data type. in order to make it a little denser and more parametrized, consider changing it to phone_nr_translations = [įor probe, replacement in phone_nr_translations: So you say tamaytoes, and i say tomahtoes: the original solution is quite good in terms of clarity and genericity. to use translate() here is IMHO just the wrong tool, and nowhere as conceptually simple and generic as the original replacement chain. I recommend against using regular expressions where not inevitable they just add conceptual overhead and a speed penalty otherwise. after all, the OP complained about the original replacement chain being too ‘clumsy’, not too ‘slow’. SilentGhost: dis.dis does demonstrate underlying conceptual / executional complexity. On a side note, store your phone numbers as strings to deal with leading zeros, and use a phone formatter where needed. The original replace method will add 6 additional instructions per replacement, while all of the others will stay constant. regex is slightly less efficient, but more compatible (which I see a requirement for you). The translate method will be the most efficient, though relies on py2.6+. Print (TEST_PHONE_NUM).translate(None,' ()') The following is a test program to demonstrate this using the dis module (See Doug Hellman's PyMOTW on the module here for more detailed info). The suggestion made by ChristopheD will work just fine, but is not as efficient. > re.sub('', '', num) # Match all non-digits (), replace them with empty string, where found in the `num` variable. Words given as an argument will return the same error.How about just using regular expressions?.ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '7.9' On the other hand, print(int("7.9")) will result in an error since a float as a string object cannot be converted to an integer. For example : print(int(7.9)) will print 7. A floating point (an integer with fractional part) as an argument will return the float rounded down to the nearest whole integer.The error should make it clear to you that you need to convert the age object to an integer before adding something to it. TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'int' objects Output: Traceback (most recent call last): This is further illustrated in the next example: age = "18" Example Usage: # Here age is a string objectĪlthough the output is visually similar, keep in mind that the first line is a string object while the following line is an integer object. Similar to the built-in str() method, Python also offers the handy int() method that takes a string object as an argument and returns an integer. ![]() |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |